DOJ Redacted Statements About Epstein Made by Trump's Lawyers
The Trump Department of (preventing) Justice has been caught red-handed redacting a damaging email backing up the fact that Trump lied about cutting ties with Jeffrey Epstein in the mid-2000s. How many times will this have to be backed up before MAGA accepts that their hero is a monster who surrounded himself with other monsters?
While reviewing documents from the Epstein file dump earlier this month, Democratic Congressman Jamie Raskin discovered that the DOJ had blacked out a file that included an email Epstein forwarded to his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, involving a conversation between Epstein’s lawyers and lawyers for Trump.
“Epstein’s lawyers synopsized and quoted Trump as saying that Jeffrey Epstein was not a member of his club at Mar-a-Lago — but he was a guest at Mar-a-Lago, and he had never been asked to leave. And that was redacted for some …inscrutable reason,” Raskin told reporters on Monday.
The unredacted version of the file further solidifies Trump’s continued links to Epstein. It is also concrete evidence that the DOJ is deliberately hiding information it is legally required to disclose under the Epstein Transparency Act.
When Epstein was arrested in 2019 and charged with sex trafficking and conspiracy, Trump told reporters that Epstein was “a fixture of Palm Beach” in Florida, and “I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him.”
Sounds like we need to round up everyone in Palm Beach and throw them into a supermax prison, then.
“I had a falling out with him a long time ago. I don’t think I’ve spoken to him for 15 years. I wasn’t a fan.”
Trump said their relationship ended in 2004, which was conveniently a few years before Epstein was convicted in Florida in 2008 for soliciting prostitution from a minor as part of a sweetheart plea deal given to him by Alexander Acosta, the same guy who served as Trump’s United States Secretary of Labor in 2017. But I’m sure that’s just an unrelated coincidence.
It also doesn’t help that Trump claims he only kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-lago after the sex offender “stole” staff from his spa. That staff included Virginia Giuffre, who Maxwell recruited as a sex slave for Epstein when she was still a minor. FROM Mar-a -Lago.
The file was among more than 3.5 million documents the department released two weeks ago from the 6 million it was legally required to release.
The boondogled, shodddily covered up, and highly corrupt release has created an immediate public backlash, especially after it was revealed that, despite spending over a year “redacting the files for the safety of the victims,” some victims discovered that they STILL were in the files, while the names of co-conspirators were redacted.
In one email from 2014, for example, the DOJ found it appropriate to redact the name of a creep who emailed Epstein: “Thank you for a fun night… Your littlest girl was a little naughty.”
Also deemed worthy of redaction was the receiver of an email from Epstein, where he asks the redacted recipient, “where are you? are you ok I loved the torture video.”
And in one particularly damning interview conducted by the FBI in September 2021, a woman told the FBI how Ghislaine Maxwell pimped her out to Trump and his friends at a party, making it clear that she was “available” for their use.
Bafflingly, the names of the men involved in the victim’s testimony were redacted (except for Trump).
“There’s no way you can run a billion dollar international child sex trafficking ring with just two people committing crimes: Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell,” Raskin said.



I want to ask the cultists a serious question — not as an enemy, but as someone watching from the outside.
If this were anyone else — a Democrat, a celebrity you disliked, or a political opponent — and there were documented emails, redactions hiding conversations with Epstein’s lawyers, and sworn testimony placing that person in Epstein’s orbit, would you dismiss it as nothing? Or would you demand answers?
Because this isn’t about party. It’s about whether your standards change depending on who is involved.
Power protects itself. It always has. And the most reliable protection powerful people have is loyal followers who refuse to look directly at uncomfortable facts.
You don’t have to accept everything immediately. But you do owe it to yourself to ask one honest question:
Are you defending the truth — or are you defending a man?
History shows that those two things are not always the same.
Lips are moving, republicans be lying, scientific fact!